1) Hilary’s campaign team held back emails between Hillary and Obama after gov’t subpoena: 2 LIES, NOTHING WAS HELD BACK, AND JOHN PODESTA ONLY ASKED IF POTUS WOULD USE EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.
1. OK, took me a while to track down the actual e-mail this referenced, but I found it. Nothing there, really. Really? These 28 words are what all your fuss is about? J.P. ASKING A QUESTION regarding if emails to POTUS should be withheld...IN CASE THE POTUS MIGHT INVOKE HIS LEGAL RIGHT TO EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE? That's it? Nothing illegal here. Most "possibly incriminating" sentence of all these 28 words is,"We could get them to ask for that." Which MIGHT mean 'we should ask them to invoke executive privilege' OR might mean 'we might ask if they INTEND TO invoke executive privilege.' Either way, not illegal, more like saying, 'I want to not screw up my job, so I wanna make certain that I don't ILLEGALLY release classified material that the POTUS intends to invoke their E.P. power over.' End of story. Either way, you guys (and even I) used MANY TIMES MORE WORDS discussing this than the ENTIRE EMAIL contained.
2) Hillary breaks FEC rules by meeting with Super PAC: LIE, NO LAW WAS BROKEN.
2. You know, this IS America, you CANNOT outlaw meeting with people. I know, I know, you WANT this to be New Soviet Russia, where Donald’s Best Pal rules, but its not, its still America.
It is perfectly legal for me to MEET WITH whomever I like, as OFTEN as I like, and for LONG as I like.
There is no law against any of that, nor can there ever be, IN AMERICA.
Making your entire premise " Hillary breaks FEC rules by meeting with Super PAC" ENTIRELY INVALID.
The RULES SAY that if the nominee INFLUENCES THE SPENDING OF PAC MONEY, that is against the rules. Something 'Pubes are about a thousand times more likely to do than Dems any-day (I am neither, BTW).
3) Hillary hates “everyday Americans.” MEANINGLESS, LIKELY SARCASM, NOT UNLAWFUL, AND EVEN MORE LIKELY A HACKER "ADD-ON."
3. These emails were HACKED by RUSSIAN HACKERS. Exactly the people that people like you would COMPLETELY TRUST not to have inserted a sentence into a document before 'releasing' it? Does that REALLY sound smart, conservative, and NOT INSANE?!?
Let's assume - worse case scenario - that J.P. REALLY wrote that line. Looks like sarcasm to me, which CANNOT come across at all in written txt.
Let's go even one step further into Insaneville and assume BOTH that he actually wrote that, AND that is was not sarcasm (which you cannot assume). Fine. He's not Hilary. He's not running for President. He should be fired. Was that written by Hilary? No. End.
4) Clinton’s dream is OPEN BORDERS: THESE WERE QUOTES FROM YOUR PARTY'S FOUNDER, ABRAHAM LINCOLN:
"...the Republican Party, which in its 1864 platform proudly declared what open borders advocates echo today:
... That foreign immigration, which in the past has added so much to the wealth, development of resources and increase of power to the nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations, should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy.
But before that, Abraham Lincoln in 1855 had this to say:
'... How can any one who abhors the oppression of [word not allowed by your censor software], be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that “all men are created equal.” We now practically read it “all men are created equal, except [word not allowed by your censor software].” When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read “all men are created equal, except [word not allowed by your censor software], and foreigners, and catholics.” When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic].'"
5) Clinton admits USA can’t possibly vet all refugees: LIES!!! HILARY WAS NOT EVEN TALKING ABOUT AMERICA IN LYNCH'S LYING QUOTE.
5. You Guys, said: "At a luncheon for the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago Vanguard in October 2013, Clinton said that the influx of Syrian refugees into neighboring Jordan – fueled by the ongoing civil war – makes checking identities of all asylum seekers impossible.
"And particularly with Syria which has everyone quite worried, Jordan because it's on their border and they have hundreds of thousands of refugees and they can't possibly vet all those refugees so they don't know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees," Clinton said, according to speech transcripts found in Podesta's emails."
ARE YOU GUYS EVEN READING THE WORDS YOU YOURSELVES ARE PUTTING OUT? IT SIMPLY DOES NOT SAY THAT.
Clearly, Hilary was talking about the Syrian/Jordanian border, NOT AMERICA here.
America has the MOST EXTREME VETTING of any nation on Earth for refugees. It takes two WEEKS for Germany to vette a refugee into their country...IT TAKES TWO YEARS OF FURTHER VETTING AFTER THAT TO BE ALLOWED ENTRY INTO THE US.
This is a non-issue!
6) Clinton Admits to Having Two Sets Of Policies: SO WHAT?!?
6. Clinton admits to being a politician...so what?
7) Funding ISIS: Hillary Clinton wrote an email to John Podesta on August 17, 2014, acknowledging that the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS. YEAH, BECAUSE UNLIKE TRUMP SHE KNOWS THE WORLD AND THE REAL ISSUES, YOU [word not allowed by your censor software]!!!
7. You Guys: "Hillary Clinton wrote an email to John Podesta on August 17, 2014, acknowledging that the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS."
Again, SO WHAT?!? Hilary knows they are bad actors, and suggests "bringing pressure on them." What -exactly- do you expect Trump to do differently? Bomb them? Is That What You Really Want?
8) Clinton & Obama Tricked Americans On Iran Deal: LIES!!!
8. "Clinton & Obama Tricked Americans On Iran Deal"
THIS IS NOTHING BUT AN UNSUBSTANTIATED HACK JOB by a known biased neocon. There is NOT ONE FACT in this whole article, inspired by an "anonymous congressional source" who may or may not exist, and even if he does, so what? Everyone knows 'Pubes in Congress don't like the deal (because a 'Pube pres didn’t cut it). Again, so what?
9) “We are screwed!” over conflicts with Clinton Foundation: HACK JOB!!!
9. WOW THAT'S A HACK JOB! This entire email is about a co. CEO that did business with the Clinton Foundation being upset at the inexperienced and ineffective leadership of Chelsea, and being upset that an inexperienced upstart should have control over a big foundation just because of who her parents are. The "We are screwed" comments HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY LAWS BEING BROKEN, he was afraid of bad publicity if the bad blood between him and Chelsea was to be made public. AGAIN, SO WHAT? There is not one foundation ever run by a young relative of a founder that does not engender this kind of bad relationship between the heir and older more experienced businesspeople who feel that their experience is being ignored or shunned. Again, SO WHAT?
10) Bill & Chelsea nearly drove Foundation executive to suicide: SOMEONE GET THEM A MEDAL!!!
10. So, the OTHER WAY of writing this BIASED JOKE of an article would be, "Bill&Chelsea SAVE MAN from comitting suicide!"
11) Drivers Licenses To Illegal Aliens: YES!!!
11. Yes...everyone who DRIVES IN THIS COUNTRY should have to conform to the LAW and PAY FOR and EARN and GET TESTED FOR drivers licenses...so your daughters are safer on the goddamned road. AGAIN, SO WHAT?!?
12) Pay To Play Exposed: YES, THE SKY IS ACTUALLY BLUE!!! (well, not on Alaria, but still)
12. On appointing people to ambassadorial positions because they contributed money to the Clinton Foundation:
Ambassadorial appointments have always been gifts to be given at the will of the President. People only vie for and pay (or volunteer) for appointment to places like Sweden, Britain, Japan, or the like...never Iraq or Russia.
38% of Ronald Reagan’s appointments were political (meaning friends and contributors, rather than career ambassadors).
38% of both of the Bush presidents' appointments were also political.
ONLY 28% of Clinton's appointments were political, THAT'S A FULL TEN PERCENTAGE POINTS FEWER THAN REAGAN, G.H. BUSH AND G.H.W. BUSH.
13) Fake Trump Craigslist Ad Scheme: NOT HILARY!!!
13. Has nothing to do with H. Clinton.
14) Clinton went anti-Muslim: NO SHE DI'NT!!!
14. No, she did not. A staffer recommended her to, she refused. Again, a lie by Denis Lynch. Has nothing to do with Hilary...except to speak to her HIGH integrity.
15) Donors expect special favors: NOT HILARY.
15. Number one, this has nothing to do with Hilary Clinton. Number Two, this flies right in the face of your previous assertion that Chelsea was somehow complicit, corrupt, or to inexperienced to run the family's foundation. So the head of a foundation is concerned about something and looks into it? GREAT, she's doing her job!
16) Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman urged her to lie to the public on whether she sent classified information: AGAIN, NOT HILARY!!!
16. Again, what a STAFFER says has nothing to do with what Hilary DID. Should a STAFFER be fired? Maybe. Still nothing illegal. Again, speaks to nothing regarding Hilary, except her high integrity in refusing to take the recommendation.